Tunet and domain adaptation is a powerful technique that allows us to transfer knowledge from one domain to another, even when the tasks are quite different. This is achieved through the use of transfer learning.
Transfer learning enables us to use pre-trained models as a starting point for our own tasks, saving us time and computational resources. For example, a model trained on a large dataset of images can be fine-tuned for a specific task like image classification.
The key to successful transfer learning is to find a model that has been trained on a related task or dataset. This is where domain adaptation comes in, which enables us to adapt the pre-trained model to the new domain.
Discover more: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation
Transfer Learning Paradigms
Transfer learning paradigms are a crucial aspect of domain adaptation and tunet. They allow us to leverage pre-trained models and adapt them to new, unseen domains.
One such paradigm is Transfer Metric Learning, which has been explored in the paper "Transfer Metric Learning: Algorithms, Applications and Outlooks" on arXiv. This approach focuses on learning a metric that can be transferred across domains.
Recommended read: Parked Domains
Another paradigm is Knowledge Transfer, which has been applied in papers such as "Attention Bridging Network for Knowledge Transfer" and "Few-Shot Image Recognition with Knowledge Transfer", both presented at ICCV2019. This approach involves transferring knowledge from a source domain to a target domain.
Sim-to-Real Transfer is also an important paradigm, where a model is trained in a simulated environment and then transferred to a real-world environment. DIRL: Domain-Invariant Representation Learning Approach for Sim-to-Real Transfer is a notable example of this paradigm, presented at CoRL2020.
Transfer learning libraries, such as thuml/Transfer-Learning-Library, provide APIs that can be used to implement transfer learning paradigms. The library was adjusted following a survey on transferability in deep learning.
Here are some notable examples of transfer learning paradigms:
- Transfer Metric Learning: Algorithms, Applications and Outlooks [arXiv]
- Attention Bridging Network for Knowledge Transfer [ICCV2019]
- DIRL: Domain-Invariant Representation Learning Approach for Sim-to-Real Transfer [CoRL2020]
- POUF: Prompt-oriented unsupervised fine-tuning for large pre-trained models [ICML2023]
- Adversarial Style Mining for One-Shot Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [NeurIPS2020]
Domain Adaptation Techniques
Domain adaptation techniques can be broadly categorized into several types. Semi-supervised domain adaptation, for instance, involves using both labeled and unlabeled data from the source and target domains to adapt the model.
Worth a look: Low Rank Adaptation
Some popular semi-supervised domain adaptation methods include Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation With Source Label Adaptation, Multi-level Consistency Learning for Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation, and AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptation.
Other techniques include self-training-based methods, which utilize pseudo-labeling and self-training to adapt the model to the target domain. Probabilistic Contrastive Learning for Domain Adaptation and Gradual Domain Adaptation via Self-Training of Auxiliary Models are examples of this approach.
Here are some notable domain adaptation techniques:
- Semi-supervised domain adaptation methods: Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation With Source Label Adaptation, Multi-level Consistency Learning for Semi-supervised Domain Adaptation, and AdaMatch: A Unified Approach to Semi-Supervised Learning and Domain Adaptation
- Self-training-based methods: Probabilistic Contrastive Learning for Domain Adaptation and Gradual Domain Adaptation via Self-Training of Auxiliary Models
- Optimal transport-based methods: MOST: Multi-Source Domain Adaptation via Optimal Transport for Student-Teacher Learning and LAMDA: Label Matching Deep Domain Adaptation
- Few-shot domain adaptation methods: Domain-Adaptive Few-Shot Learning and Few-shot Domain Adaptation by Causal Mechanism Transfer
Semi-Supervised Learning-Based
Semi-supervised learning-based domain adaptation techniques are particularly useful when dealing with limited labeled data in the target domain. They leverage both labeled and unlabeled data from the source and target domains to improve model performance.
One such technique is the use of feature transformation ensemble models with batch spectral regularization, as seen in the paper "Feature transformation ensemble model with batch spectral regularization for cross-domain few-shot classification" [arXiv 18 May 2020][Pytorch]. This approach can be particularly effective in scenarios where the number of labeled samples is limited.
Another technique is the ensemble model with batch spectral regularization and data blending, which can be used for cross-domain few-shot learning with unlabeled data, as demonstrated in the paper "Ensemble model with batch spectral regularization and data blending for cross-domain few-shot learning with unlabeled data" [arXiv 8 June 2020][Pytorch].
Here are some key semi-supervised learning-based domain adaptation techniques:
- Feature transformation ensemble model with batch spectral regularization [arXiv 18 May 2020][Pytorch]
- Ensemble model with batch spectral regularization and data blending [arXiv 8 June 2020][Pytorch]
- Mutual Mean-Teaching: Pseudo Label Refinery for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation on Person Re-identification [ICLR2020][Pytorch]
- Self-similarity Grouping: A Simple Unsupervised Cross Domain Adaptation Approach for Person Re-identification [ICCV2019 Oral][Pytorch]
These techniques can be particularly useful in scenarios where the amount of labeled data is limited, and semi-supervised learning can help improve model performance.
Remote Sensing
Remote sensing is a field where domain adaptation techniques have shown great promise. Open-set black-box domain adaptation for remote sensing image scene classification is a specific area of research that has gained attention in recent years.
Researchers have proposed various methods for tackling this challenge, including RefRec, which refines pseudo-labels via shape reconstruction for unsupervised 3D domain adaptation.
Unsupervised domain adaptation in LiDAR semantic segmentation with self-supervision and gated adapters is another approach that has been explored.
These methods aim to improve the accuracy and robustness of remote sensing image scene classification by adapting to new and unseen domains.
Some notable papers in this area include:
- Open-Set Black-Box Domain Adaptation for Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification [GRSL 2023]
- RefRec: Pseudo-labels Refinement via Shape Reconstruction for Unsupervised 3D Domain Adaptation [3DV 2021 Oral]
- Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in LiDAR Semantic Segmentation with Self-Supervision and Gated Adapters [ICRA2022]
These papers demonstrate the potential of domain adaptation techniques in remote sensing and highlight the need for further research in this area.
Randomization
Domain Randomization is a technique used to improve simulation-to-real generalization without accessing target domain data. It involves randomizing the simulation environment to make it more robust and adaptable.
DeceptionNet, a network-driven approach, was introduced in the paper "DeceptionNet: Network-Driven Domain Randomization" at ICCV2019. This approach shows promise in improving generalization.
Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency is another technique that combines domain randomization with pyramid consistency to achieve robust generalization. This method was also presented at ICCV2019 in the paper "Domain Randomization and Pyramid Consistency: Simulation-to-Real Generalization Without Accessing Target Domain Data".
Intriguing read: Domain Randomization
Pond: Time Series
Pond is a framework for time series domain adaptation that utilizes prompts to capture common and domain-specific information from multiple source domains. It's designed to tackle the challenges of domain adaptation from multiple domains, where existing techniques often focus on single source domains.
The Pond framework addresses three key challenges: exploring domain-specific information, learning domain-specific information that changes over time, and evaluating learned domain-specific information. To do this, it extends the idea of prompt tuning to time series analysis and introduces a conditional module for each source domain to generate prompts from time series input data.
Pond's efficacy and robustness are extensively validated through experiments across 50 scenarios, encompassing four datasets. The results show that Pond outperforms state-of-the-art comparison methods by up to 66% on the F1-score.
Explainable and Incremental Methods
Explainable and incremental methods are crucial in tune and domain adaptation. Visualizing adapted knowledge in domain transfer is a key aspect of explainable methods, as seen in the paper "Visualizing Adapted Knowledge in Domain Transfer" presented at CVPR 2021.
Incremental methods, on the other hand, focus on adapting to new domains over time. Incremental unsupervised domain-adversarial training of neural networks is an example of this, as demonstrated in the paper "Incremental Unsupervised Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks" published in TNNLS 2020.
Some notable incremental domain adaptation methods include Lifelong Domain Adaptation via Consolidated Internal Distribution and Continual Adaptation of Visual Representations via Domain Randomization and Meta-learning, both of which were presented at NeurIPS 2021.
Expand your knowledge: Proximal Gradient Methods for Learning
Explainable
Explainable methods are crucial for understanding how models make decisions. This is especially important in domain transfer, where models are adapted to new domains.
One notable example is Visualizing Adapted Knowledge in Domain Transfer, presented at CVPR2021 and implemented using PyTorch. This project aims to provide insights into the knowledge transferred during domain adaptation.
By visualizing the adapted knowledge, researchers can better understand how the model is learning from the new domain. This can lead to more accurate and reliable models.
Incremental
Incremental methods are a key part of explainable and incremental methods, allowing neural networks to learn from new data without forgetting previously learned information.
These methods are particularly useful in scenarios where data is constantly changing, such as in the case of incremental unsupervised domain-adversarial training of neural networks, as seen in the study "Incremental Unsupervised Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks" from 2020.
One of the key challenges in incremental learning is adapting to new domains, which is where techniques like lifelong domain adaptation come in. This approach involves consolidating internal distributions to adapt to new domains, as seen in the study "Lifelong Domain Adaptation via Consolidated Internal Distribution" from 2021.
Related reading: Hidden Layers in Neural Networks Code Examples Tensorflow
Researchers have developed various techniques for incremental domain adaptation, including continual adaptation of visual representations via domain randomization and meta-learning, as seen in "Continual Adaptation of Visual Representations via Domain Randomization and Meta-learning" from 2021.
Here are some notable examples of incremental domain adaptation techniques:
- Lifelong Domain Adaptation via Consolidated Internal Distribution [NeurIPS2021]
- Continual Adaptation of Visual Representations via Domain Randomization and Meta-learning [CVPR2021]
- ConDA: Continual Unsupervised Domain Adaptation [CVPR2021]
- Gradient Regularized Contrastive Learning for Continual Domain Adaptation [AAAI2021]
- Gradual Domain Adaptation without Indexed Intermediate Domains [NeurIPS2021]
- Learning to Adapt to Evolving Domains [NeurIPS 2020][Pytorch]
- Class-Incremental Domain Adaptation [ECCV2020]
- Incremental Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Continually Changing Environments [ICRA2018]
- Continuous Manifold based Adaptation for Evolving Visual Domains [CVPR2014]
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between fine tuning and domain adaptation?
Fine-tuning adjusts a pre-trained model to a new task, whereas domain adaptation adjusts a model to a new data distribution within the same task. In other words, fine-tuning is about adapting to a new task, while domain adaptation is about adapting to a new environment within the same task.
What is a domain adaptation?
Domain adaptation is a technique that helps models perform better on new data by transferring knowledge from a related domain with plenty of labeled data. It's a powerful way to improve model performance when there's limited data to work with.
What is the difference between transfer learning and domain adaptation?
Transfer learning and domain adaptation differ in their approach to adapting models: transfer learning focuses on adapting to new labels, while domain adaptation adapts to new environments with the same labels. In essence, transfer learning is about changing labels, while domain adaptation is about changing environments.
Sources
- https://github.com/zhaoxin94/awesome-domain-adaptation
- https://github.com/thuml/Transfer-Learning-Library
- https://medium.com/@hisudha/train-merge-domain-adapt-llama-3-1-and-fine-tuning-35922dbda107
- https://www.nec-labs.com/blog/pond-multi-source-time-series-domain-adaptation-with-information-aware-prompt-tuning/
- https://docs.haystack.deepset.ai/v1.26/docs/domain_adaptation
Featured Images: pexels.com